The Hour of Power

After the Lord Jesus Christ rose from the dead, and just before He ascended into heaven, He made a promise to His apostles, saying,

“…ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you…” (Acts 1:8).

The power of which the Lord spoke was the power they received when they were filled with the Holy Ghost (Acts 2:4). At Pentecost, the disciples like Peter and Stephen were filled with the Spirit and given the “power” to do “great wonders and miracles” (Acts 2:43; 6:5,8). Earlier the Lord had told them to “tarry” in Jerusalem until they were endued with that “power from on high” (Luke 24:49).

Of course, the reason the Lord gave them the power to do mighty works was to confirm the WORDS they were preaching. After receiving that power, we read,

“And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following” (Mark 16:20).

Now here we have a dispensational difference. God hasn’t promised you that kind of power. You can tarry in Jerusalem all you want, and you will not be endued with power like that from on high. I know that churches often hold what they call “tarrying meetings,” where they get together to wait for the Spirit to come upon them in that miraculous manner. But no one today receives that kind of power from the Spirit, simply because the Father didn’t promise it to us members of the Body of Christ, living in the dispensation of grace.

If you want to confirm the power of God’s Word today, you have to do it by demonstrating God’s power in your personal life. When you display God’s patience in the midst of your difficult circumstances, you exhibit the power of God in a mighty way! And when difficult people tax your patience, you can display the power of God mightily by exhibiting His longsuffering. You can also show the power of God’s holiness when
you are tempted to sin and you resist the temptation steadfastly. If you want to talk about demonstrating the power of God, that’s how it’s done in this dispensation. We still live in the hour of power, but the nature of God’s power is different than it was at Pentecost.

But the filling of the Spirit didn’t just give the disciples the power to work miracles. It gave them another kind of power, the kind the Spirit gave the prophet Micah in ancient Israel:

But truly I am full of power by the spirit of the LORD, and of judgment, and of might, to declare unto Jacob his transgression, and to Israel his sin” (Micah 3:8).

Do you have any idea how much power it took to stand in front of a bunch of unsaved Jews, who thought they were the favored people of God just because they were born of the seed of Abraham, and tell them how sinful they are? Micah knew!

And so did men like Stephen, who bravely charged the Jews with the death of the prophets (Acts 7:51,52), and the twelve apostles, who charged the people of Israel with the death of Christ, and threatened them with His resurrection. Their message at Pentecost said, as it were, “You killed Him, but He rose from the dead, and now He’s angry with you, so you’d better repent!” (Acts 2:22-36).

But here we have yet another dispensational difference. It’s not up to us to show the nation of Israel her sins, or any other nation for that matter—including the nation in which we live! Though you wouldn’t know it from the way most of Christianity conducts itself, by going around pointing out how sinful our nation is in legalizing things like abortion and gay marriage. All that does is make unsaved people hate Christianity, and turn a deaf ear to the gospel we proclaim.

Our job is rather to remind individuals of their own personal sins. All that does is help people see their need of a Savior! Once they get saved and learn to accept the Bible as God’s Word, then they are willing to accept what God says in His Word about things like abortion and homosexuality.

Remember, God has called us to be fishers of men, not clean up the pond! That means if you want to fix what’s wrong with our nation, don’t become a political activist. Become an evangelist and change the nation by changing the hearts of men, one precious soul at a time.

To the Reader:

Some of our Two Minutes articles were written many years ago by Pastor C. R. Stam for publication in newspapers. When many of these articles were later compiled in book form, Pastor Stam wrote this word of explanation in the Preface:

"It should be borne in mind that the newspaper column, Two Minutes With the Bible, has now been published for many years, so that local, national and international events are discussed as if they occurred only recently. Rather than rewrite or date such articles, we have left them just as they were when first published. This, we felt, would add to the interest, especially since our readers understand that they first appeared as newspaper articles."

To this we would add that the same is true for the articles written by others that we continue to add, on a regular basis, to the Two Minutes library. We hope that you'll agree that while some of the references in these articles are dated, the spiritual truths taught therein are timeless.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.

The House That David Couldn’t Build – Acts 7:46-60

Summary:

The last type of Christ that Stephen points out is David, who “found favour” with God (7:46) because he was a man after God’s own heart (I Sam. 13:14).  David did lots of great things, but Stephen points to the one thing he desired to do but God had Solomon do instead: build Him a temple (7:47).

Why?  Well, Stephen says David sought to “find a tabernacle” for Him because he’s quoting Ps. 132:1-5, where “find out” means to invent.  God lived in a tent, but David wanted to invent a new kind of dwelling place for Him!  This is a type of how the Lord came to Israel the first time in the tent of a human body (cf. II Pe. 1:13,14), but will return in a body that is so much grander, it will be like the difference between the tabernacle of Moses and the temple of Solomon.

And He’ll give Israel the kingdom they refused the first time He came.  That illustrates the point Stephen’s been making, that just like Israel wasn’t freed from Egyptian bondage during Moses’ first appearance to Israel, but was on his second appearance, so the Jews didn’t get their kingdom during the Lord’s first visit to Israel, but will at His second.

To prove to those unsaved Jews that God didn’t dwell in their temple (Acts 7:48), Stephen quoted Isaiah (v. 49).  When God asked, “where is the place of My rest?” He was implying that if He wanted a place to sleep He wouldn’t ask men to build it, He would have made it Himself “in the beginning” (Gen. 1:1) when He “made all things” (Acts 7:50), the all things in heaven and earth (v. 49).  Isaiah’s point was that God didn’t dwell in a temple (Isa. 66:1), He dwelt in a “man” (Isa. 66:2), the Lord Jesus (Jo. 10:38).

That was all those unsaved Jews were going to take from Stephen!  When he shifted gears and began to indict them (v. 51), it means he must have seen them picking up stones to stone him.  “Stiffnecked” (v. 51) means God tells you to do something and your neck is too stubbornly stiff to bow your head and say “Yes, God,” because you turned out of His way (Ex. 32:7-9).  Stephen’s use of that word would remind them how God said He’s respond to stiff necks (Ex. 32:9, 10; 33:5)

When he also called them uncircumcised in heart and ears (v. 51), God said He’d punish that too (Jer. 4:4; 6:10, 11).  He’s telling the Jewish council that they could expect God’s wrath to fall on them too now that the stoning of Stephen closed their extra year of opportunity to receive the kingdom (Lu. 13:6-9) that Peter offered (Acts 3:19, 20).

Their fathers resisted the Spirit (v. 51) when He spoke to them through Moses (Isa. 63:9,10) and through the prophets (Neh. 9:30).  God required the blood of those prophets of that generation (Lu. 11:49, 50) because they’d been given more spiritual light than any generation before it (Mt. 13:17).

The word “disposition” (Acts 7:53) can mean distribution.  Stephen is talking about the distributing of the law to Israel with angels (De. 33:2).They “ordained” the law (Gal. 3:19) in the way we ordain men to the ministry, by recommending it.

Gnashing on Stephen with their teeth (Acts 7:54) means they tore into him in wrath (cf. Job 16:9).  He responded by telling them about the vision they couldn’t see, that of Christ standing at God’s right hand (7:55, 56).  After He ascended, He sat down there (Heb. 10:12) to indicate the work of our redemption was finished.  But those unsaved Jews would know that He will rise to judge His enemies (Ps. 110:1), even if “His people” have become His enemies (Isa. 3:13).

The “witnesses” (Acts 7:58) were the false witnesses who they bribed to testify against Stephen (Acts 6:11-14).  The Jews were always tearing off their clothes when they were mad (cf.Acts 22:23), and they were murderously mad here.

We see a proof that the Lord was God when Stephen is seen “calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus.” (v. 59).  He died as the Lord died, praying for the enemies who were killing him (v. 60 cf. Lu. 23:34).  God answered the Lord’s prayer by giving Israel another year.  He answered Stephen’s prayer in the sense that the dispensation of the mystery interrupted the judgment the Lord was standing to give.  He didn’t answer in that Paul soon wrote “the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost” (I Th. 2:16), and their punishment will still fall in the Tribulation and at the Second Coming that will follow.

Video of this sermon is available on YouTube: The House That David Couldn’t Build – Acts 7:46-60

The Great Debate!

When Paul wrote that “young women” with “husbands” and “children” are to be “keepers at home” (Titus 2:4,5), the exact meaning of that latter phrase has inspired debates among Christians of epic proportion!  At the core of this discussion we usually find the issue of whether or not a mom should work outside the home.  And one of the examples of Christian women in the Bible who can help answer this question is a woman the Bible describes as “virtuous,” saying,

“…a virtuous woman… perceiveth that her merchandise is good… she layeth her hands to the spindle, and… the distaff…” (Proverbs 31:10,18,19).

The spindle and distaff were used in making cloth, and that word “merchandise” refers to goods that are bought and sold.  That means this lady was a merchant!  That agrees with how this chapter later says of her, “she maketh fine linen, and selleth it” to other merchants (v. 24).

From her example, I would suggest it is not unvirtuous for a Christian wife to work outside the home.  If it be argued that she ran a home business, as opposed to working for an employer, I would invite you to consider that in those days most men were also self-employed.  It was the Industrial Revolution that led men away from family-owned farms and businesses to work outside the home.  So this virtuous woman was employed in the same way most men were in her day.

Over in the New Testament, we see another merchant named Lydia, “a seller of purple” (Acts 16:14).  She had a “household” (v. 15), a family, as well as a business that took her and her family away from her home in Thyatira to Philippi, where she too worked outside her home.

Beloved, we didn’t create the two-income society in which we live.  Women in the ‘60s were sold a bill of goods when they were told that being a wife and mother wasn’t a high enough ideal to aim at in life.  But when they went to work, prices rose accordingly.  When retailers saw people had more money, they charged more for their products, forcing many wives to work just to make ends meet.  So as I say, we didn’t create this two-income society, but we have to live in it.

And this has caused no end of unhappiness for believers and unbelievers alike.  Back in the ‘90s I heard a radio talk show host tell how he took calls from wives in the ‘60s who felt trapped because they wanted to work outside the home but couldn’t, for in those days jobs for women were scarce.  But in the ‘90s he heard from women who also felt trapped, but for the opposite reason.  They longed to be able to stay home with their children, but couldn’t afford to do so.

If it is your understanding that moms shouldn’t work, I have nothing but respect for your conviction.  It is extremely difficult to raise a family on one income as I did, and those choosing to do so face an uphill climb.  Standing firm in the face of what feminism did to us takes courage.

But whatever your conviction, it is my sincere hope that you will avoid being critical of those who are of a different persuasion.  Paul says,

“Who art thou that judgest another man’s servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth… Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind” (Romans 14:4,5).

All Christians belong to the Lord.  He is our Master, we are His servants.  So when you judge another believer, you are judging God’s servant!  And when you do, you should know that the Lord is on his side.  How do I know?  Because Paul went on to say,

“…to his own master he standeth or falleth.  Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand” (Romans 14:4).

This means that no matter what your personal conviction is as to the meaning of “keepers at home,” God will uphold you at the Judgment Seat of Christ—that is, if you live by your conviction and don’t judge others.  What do you say we all determine right here and now to be grace believers in deed and not just in word, and be gracious in this sensitive area of life as well.

To the Reader:

Some of our Two Minutes articles were written many years ago by Pastor C. R. Stam for publication in newspapers. When many of these articles were later compiled in book form, Pastor Stam wrote this word of explanation in the Preface:

"It should be borne in mind that the newspaper column, Two Minutes With the Bible, has now been published for many years, so that local, national and international events are discussed as if they occurred only recently. Rather than rewrite or date such articles, we have left them just as they were when first published. This, we felt, would add to the interest, especially since our readers understand that they first appeared as newspaper articles."

To this we would add that the same is true for the articles written by others that we continue to add, on a regular basis, to the Two Minutes library. We hope that you'll agree that while some of the references in these articles are dated, the spiritual truths taught therein are timeless.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.

A Perfect Stranger – Acts 7:29-45

 

Summary:

When Moses killed an Egyptian to save a Hebrew, a fellow Jew said he knew about it (Acts 7:28) so Moses fled and became a stranger to his people (v. 29).  That Jewish man refused to let Moses be his peacemaker (v. 23-27), a type of how the Jews refused to let Christ be their peacemaker.

Moses was gone from Israel a long time (v. 30), a type of how Christ would be too.  Stephen is pointing out these types to witness about Christ to the Jewish council.  But Moses having two sons with a Gentile isn’t a type of God having sons among the Gentiles today, as some say.  The dispensation of the mystery was “hid in God” (Eph. 3:9), it wasn’t hid in the types in Scripture.  The idea of two sons always spoke of Israel’s need to be born again.  God rejected Ishmael and accepted Isaac, and rejected Esau and accepted Jacob, etc.

God sent Moses back to Israel from a burning fire (Acts 7:30), and will send Christ back to them the same way (Dn. 7:9-11).  Both men draw near to God to hear His instructions (Acts 7:31).  The Lord wouldn’t tremble as the Son of God, but He would as the son of Abraham (v. 32,33).  The ground in heaven is as “holy” as the type we see with Moses (v. 33).

God saw and felt the affliction of His people (7:34 cf. Isa. 63:9), and He feels ours too!  God sent Moses to deliver them from Pharaoh and their tribulations, and will send Christ back to deliver them from Antichrist and the tribulation. The Moses they rejected became their leader the second time he went to save them (Acts 7:35), just as the Christ they rejected will become their leader the second time He comes to save them.  That’s Stephen’s point throughout this chapter (7:13).  But first God had to send ten plagues on Pharaoh (7:36)—and He’ll send the same ten plagues on Antichrist!

After talking about all the ways Christ was like Moses, Stephen then reminded the council that Moses predicted God would raise up a prophet like him (7:37)!  They found Moses too frightening (Deut. 18:15,16) so God promised them a less scary prophet (v. 17,18).  He would speak God’s words just as Moses did though (v. 18 cf. John 8:22; 18:19-21).

The “angel” that was with Moses in Israel’s church (Acts 7:38) was “the angel of God’s presence” (Isa. 63:9 cf. Deut. 23:13,14).  He gave them the “lively” or life-giving oracles (v. 38 cf. I Pe. 1:3) the oracles of the Scriptures (cf. Rom. 3:1,2).

Stephen’s hearers couldn’t deny their fathers refused Moses (Acts 7:39) because their Bible said so (Neh. 9:13-17).  The Egyptians worshipped idols, so that’s what Stephen meant when he said the hearts of the Jews turned back to Egypt (Acts 7:39) “saying” (v. 40) they should make a calf.

Stephen is warning them of their future in the Tribulation by pointing to their past.  They turned to idols (7:41) when Moses was gone too long (Ex. 32:1,23), and they will give up on the Lord’s return too (II Pe. 3:3,4) and turn to idols (Rev. 9:20; 13:11-14).  They’ll worship the “devils” (9:20) of “the host of heaven” (Acts 7:42).  When men worship idols or the stars, they are actually worshipping the devils they represent.

In Moses’ day, unsaved Jews didn’t worship God with their sacrifices (v. 42), they worshipped Moloch and Chiun (v. 43) in the false “tabernacle” they carried through the wilderness for those false gods (cf. Amos 5:22-26).  It remained the tabernacle of rebels like we read about later in Numbers 16:24.

Satan always inspires men to mix the worship of God with the worship of idols (cf. Jud. 17:3), just as the church of Rome does today, for the worship of idols is the worship of Satan and his host.  The church of the Antichrist will be a false Judaism like they had in Moses’ day, just as Rome is a false Christianity.  God vowed to carry the Jews back to Babylon where idolatry started to cure them of idolatry (Acts 7:43).

Jews in Moses’ day did have a true tabernacle though (7:44).  We know the “tabernacle of witness” was God’s tabernacle because He told Aaron to minister there (Num. 18:1,2).  Stephen’s point here was that Moses couldn’t bring the Jews into the promised land; it took a man named “Jesus” (Joshua) to do that (Acts 7:45).  And Moses couldn’t bring the Jews in Stephen’s day into the promised land of the kingdom of heaven on earth either.  It would take a man named Jesus to do that too.

Video of this sermon is available on YouTube: A Perfect Stranger – Acts 7:29-45

Comptrollers Who Push Strollers

If you want to get a big fight going in a small amount of time, just ask a few Christians what they think Paul meant when he wrote that “young women” with “husbands” and “children” should be “keepers at home” (Titus 2:4,5).  But the only sure way to interpret the Bible is by comparing Scripture with Scripture (I Cor. 2:13), not by comparing opinions with opinions!  With that in mind, let’s compare how the word “keeper” is used in other parts of the Bible.

For instance, you’ve probably heard Christians quote this beloved verse:

“I had rather be a doorkeeper in the house of my God, than to dwell in the tents of wickedness” (Psalm 84:10).

Doorkeepers in Israel’s temple had some pretty specific duties, some of which involved the finances of God’s house:

“…they delivered the money that was brought into the house of God, which the Levites that kept the doors had gathered… and they gave it to the workmen that wrought in the house of the Lord, to repair and amend the house” (II Chronicles 34:9,10).

As you can see, the doorkeepers in God’s house were evidently involved in the finances that were used to maintain the grandest home in the world, the temple of Solomon.  So to say you were a doorkeeper in those days probably didn’t sound like a job that came with a lot of responsibility.  But those who knew the Word of God well knew that such was not the case.

Similarly, when a Christian woman says that she’s one of the “keepers at home” that the Bible talks about, that too sounds like a job that doesn’t come with a lot of responsibility, at least in the ears of unbelievers.  But those who know the Word of God well know that that’s not the case either.  For example, in many Christian homes the wife is in charge of the finances.

This is something I like to point out in the premarital counseling class that I have with couples before I officiate at their wedding.  Some women are just naturally better at keeping the books!  God’s Word clearly teaches that “the husband is the head of the wife” (Eph. 5:23), but a wise husband recognizes his wife’s abilities and is willing to delegate some of his authority to her.

Sure, a husband could insist, “I’m the head of the home, so it’s my job to manage our finances.”  And since finances are such an extremely important aspect of the home, I can surely understand how a man might feel that way, and I have nothing but respect for his conviction.

But if that is your personal persuasion as a husband, I would invite you to consider that the finances are an extremely important aspect of businesses and corporations as well.  Yet we know that business owners and CEOs alike all employ comptrollers, CPAs and others with accounting skills to keep the books.  A leader who insists on personally managing every aspect of his organization is sure to affect his health adversely, and the same is true for the head of a home.

And needlessly so!  God calls women who are in charge of the finances “virtuous,” saying:

“…she considereth a field, and buyeth it…” (Proverbs 31:10,16).

As you can see, the virtuous woman described in this well-known passage of Scripture had a husband who allowed her to make financial decisions that were more than just incidental.  Her liberty to make such a major purchase shows that it was true that “the heart of her husband doth safely trust in her” (v. 11) in the important area of the family’s finances, as well as in other areas where she can “do him good and not evil all the days of her life” (v. 12).

The Christian home is often criticized by the world as a place where the wife and mother is little more than a dishrag and a doormat.  But this is not how the Word of God describes “keepers at home!”  The Christian wife and mother is an integral part of the management of the grandest home in the world in our own day: the Christian home.

To the Reader:

Some of our Two Minutes articles were written many years ago by Pastor C. R. Stam for publication in newspapers. When many of these articles were later compiled in book form, Pastor Stam wrote this word of explanation in the Preface:

"It should be borne in mind that the newspaper column, Two Minutes With the Bible, has now been published for many years, so that local, national and international events are discussed as if they occurred only recently. Rather than rewrite or date such articles, we have left them just as they were when first published. This, we felt, would add to the interest, especially since our readers understand that they first appeared as newspaper articles."

To this we would add that the same is true for the articles written by others that we continue to add, on a regular basis, to the Two Minutes library. We hope that you'll agree that while some of the references in these articles are dated, the spiritual truths taught therein are timeless.


Two Minutes with the Bible lets you start your day with short but powerful Bible study articles from the Berean Bible Society. Sign up now to receive Two Minutes With the Bible every day in your email inbox. We will never share your personal information and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Full Romans Series (69 Messages)

The file below contains MP3 files of all 69 Romans messages by Pastor Cornelius R. Stam in one compressed folder.  Download and extract the files to play them.  See the included file ‘index.txt’ for a list of all filenames and message titles.

The Law’s Condemnation and Solution – Romans 3:19-26

 

Summary:

The Old Testament Jews were the only ones under “the law” (3:19).  So how’d the law shut “every mouth” and find “all the world” guilty?  Well, God had already found the Gentiles guilty in Genesis 1-10 and gave them over (Rom. 1:28) at the tower of Babel.  Then He created a new nation (Gen. 12:1).  Then to prove they were no better than the Gentiles, God gave them a law.  When they showed they couldn’t keep it, every mouth was stopped, and all the world was found guilty

To be “justified” (3:20) is what men need if they are not just, which means to do what is right (Ezek. 18:5).  None of us have always done what’s right, and God requires the past (Eccl. 3:15).  So we need to be made just—justified! The Jews thought they were justified just by having the law, but Paul said no (Rom. 2:13).  No one could give a law that men could keep (Gal. 3:21).  Saved Jews knew this (Ps. 143:2).

So why’d God give the law?  To give men “the knowledge of sin” (3:20) and get them to trust the sacrifices that the law told them to bring rather than trust their own deeds.  If a Jew brought a “sacrifice of righteousness” under the law (Deut. 33:19) as God said to (Ps. 4:5), he could be made righteous. “But now” (3:21) “the righteousness of God without the law” was manifested. Today we don’t trust sacrifices of righteousness, we trust the righteous sacrifice that Christ made on the cross!  When we do, we’re made righteous (II Cor. 5:21).

But how was this new way of getting righteousness without the law witnessed by the law (3:21)?  Well, God told the Jews in the law to circumcise their hearts (Deut. 10:16), i.e., cut off the sins of the flesh.  Knowing they couldn’t do that, God promised them in the law that He would do it for them (Deut. 30:6) so they could “live” eternally.  The prophets witnessed the same thing (Ezek. 18:31; 36:26).

The law also witnessed that someday men would get righteousness without the law when Moses vailed his face so the Jews wouldn’t see the glory of the law fade or be “abolished” (II Cor. 3:13).  Then when the Jews showed they couldn’t keep the old covenant of the law, God promised them a new covenant in the prophets (Jer. 31:31-34). The only way we can get the righteousness without the law that the law and the prophets witnessed is through that covenant (IICor. 3:6).

But for us to trust Christ’s sacrifice, He had to be faithful to make it, which Paul says He was (Rom. 3:22).  That’s why Paul wanted to be found in the righteousness that comes “through the faith of Christ” (Phil. 3:9).  It used to so that this was only offered to Jews, “but now” it is offered “unto all” (Rom. 3:22).  But it only comes “upon all them that believe.”  There used to be a big difference between Jews and Gentiles (Deut. 26:4:7,8;18,19), “but now” there “is no difference” (Rom. 3:22 cf. 10:12), “for all have sinned” (Ro. 3:23).

The Jews couldn’t argue with that, for their own Bible said the same thing (Eccl 7:20).  “The glory of God” (Ro. 3:23) is that He’s never sinned, and even Jews fall short of that, though someday they will be the glory of God (Isa. 46:13).

“Grace” (Rom. 3:24) means gift (I Pe. 4:10).  Under the law, justification was by expensive sacrifices and thrice-yearly trips to Jerusalem, “but now” it is “freely by His grace.”  But Paul adds “through the redemption that is in Christ” because it had to be paid for by Christ.  To redeem means to buy or purchase (Ps. 74:2).  We are His purchase (Eph. 1:13,14).

“Propitiation” (Rom. 3:25) means to appease someone’s wrath by atonement.  Christ appeased God’s wrath, but His atonement must be “received” (5:10) “through faith in His blood” (3:25), not faith in the blood of animals.  This even propitiated God for the sins of men in the “past” (Rom. 3:25).  “Forbearance” means to hold back (Jer. 20:9).  God held back His wrath on David’s sin knowing Christ would atone for it.

Throughout the Old Testament, it wasn’t clear how God could be “just, and the justifier of him which believeth” (Rom. 3:26).  It looked like He was breaking His own law (Pr. 17:15).  But at the cross, God made Christ “wicked” when He put our sins on Him and then condemned the wicked.  Then when you believed on Him, He took His righteousness and put it on you and then justified the righteous.  But that wasn’t “declared” until Paul (Ro. 3:26)!

Video of this sermon is available on YouTube: The Law’s Condemnation and Solution – Romans 3:19-26